<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s get the Bob Quick security breach in proportion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/lets-get-the-bob-quick-security-breach-in-proportion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/lets-get-the-bob-quick-security-breach-in-proportion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:46:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Quietzapple</title>
		<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/lets-get-the-bob-quick-security-breach-in-proportion/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Quietzapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/?p=363#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Election expenses?

These are open to public scrutiny on a constituency by constituency basis, and always have been.

Opposing party Agents look at them pretty carefully in my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Election expenses?</p>
<p>These are open to public scrutiny on a constituency by constituency basis, and always have been.</p>
<p>Opposing party Agents look at them pretty carefully in my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quietzapple</title>
		<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/lets-get-the-bob-quick-security-breach-in-proportion/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>Quietzapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/?p=363#comment-563</guid>
		<description>When politicians genuinely feel that another politico should go, they usually do.

In the case of poor Bob Quick much the same applied imho, as above.

Both are professions which few members of the general public have much of a clue about it seems to me, but the existence of such social groups ought to be clear to everyone who has thought about it. 

They have their norms of conduct as do Bottom Knockers&#039; assistant labelers I imagine . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When politicians genuinely feel that another politico should go, they usually do.</p>
<p>In the case of poor Bob Quick much the same applied imho, as above.</p>
<p>Both are professions which few members of the general public have much of a clue about it seems to me, but the existence of such social groups ought to be clear to everyone who has thought about it. </p>
<p>They have their norms of conduct as do Bottom Knockers&#8217; assistant labelers I imagine . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quietzapple</title>
		<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/lets-get-the-bob-quick-security-breach-in-proportion/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Quietzapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 20:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/?p=363#comment-553</guid>
		<description>The fact that terrorism is still in check in the UK suggest that Bob Quick and the others responsible are successful.

His clear carelessness would have undermined the confidence and morale of his colleagues, so he had no choice, regardless of the public furore.  

We must hope that they continue to keep ahead of the game, and that the educational aspect of counter terrorism, to convince muslim youth that Islamo-fascism is neither legitimate nor viable, gains strength here and elsewhere. Certainly Obama seems aware that this is a vital strand in the war on terror, however it is labeled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that terrorism is still in check in the UK suggest that Bob Quick and the others responsible are successful.</p>
<p>His clear carelessness would have undermined the confidence and morale of his colleagues, so he had no choice, regardless of the public furore.  </p>
<p>We must hope that they continue to keep ahead of the game, and that the educational aspect of counter terrorism, to convince muslim youth that Islamo-fascism is neither legitimate nor viable, gains strength here and elsewhere. Certainly Obama seems aware that this is a vital strand in the war on terror, however it is labeled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/lets-get-the-bob-quick-security-breach-in-proportion/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/?p=363#comment-551</guid>
		<description>Complete drivel.  He had no responsibility for policing the G20 protests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complete drivel.  He had no responsibility for policing the G20 protests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norah</title>
		<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/lets-get-the-bob-quick-security-breach-in-proportion/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Norah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/?p=363#comment-550</guid>
		<description>This was no &quot;blunder&quot; by a man of his tenure and experience. A VERY clever way of devising a step down and away from the now glaring investigations of police brutality and an innocent man&#039;s death at G2 - which has brought much more to the forefront. He is saving his own arse (and who elses?) and what  is left of his arrogant ego and shoddy reputation. He still managed to carry out the &quot;operation&quot; and &quot;contritely&quot; issue contrived statements about &quot;public safety&quot; .. coincidence? Think not. Public is not inherently stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was no &#8220;blunder&#8221; by a man of his tenure and experience. A VERY clever way of devising a step down and away from the now glaring investigations of police brutality and an innocent man&#8217;s death at G2 &#8211; which has brought much more to the forefront. He is saving his own arse (and who elses?) and what  is left of his arrogant ego and shoddy reputation. He still managed to carry out the &#8220;operation&#8221; and &#8220;contritely&#8221; issue contrived statements about &#8220;public safety&#8221; .. coincidence? Think not. Public is not inherently stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/lets-get-the-bob-quick-security-breach-in-proportion/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 07:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/?p=363#comment-549</guid>
		<description>I am not saying that the document should be published.  I was simply making a plea that the matter be kept in proportion.  And yes, I can confirm that Bob Quick did do an excellent job as Assistant Commissioner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not saying that the document should be published.  I was simply making a plea that the matter be kept in proportion.  And yes, I can confirm that Bob Quick did do an excellent job as Assistant Commissioner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
