<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the Conservative Party under David Cameron as happy a ship as they would have us believe?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/is-the-conservative-party-under-david-cameron-as-happy-a-ship-as-they-would-have-us-believe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/is-the-conservative-party-under-david-cameron-as-happy-a-ship-as-they-would-have-us-believe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quietzapple</title>
		<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/is-the-conservative-party-under-david-cameron-as-happy-a-ship-as-they-would-have-us-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-922</link>
		<dc:creator>Quietzapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/?p=629#comment-922</guid>
		<description>Chameleon D also rather iggied the misbehaviours of Osborne G, didn&#039;&#039;t he?

Leaving aside all his manifold pre-expense row malfeasances and &quot;private&quot; scandals haven&#039;&#039;t his &quot;second&quot; home fiddles been referred for possible prosecution?

Osborne, and another Chameleon favourite Caro Spelman, of Nannygate fame, must know where the crack is buried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chameleon D also rather iggied the misbehaviours of Osborne G, didn&#8221;t he?</p>
<p>Leaving aside all his manifold pre-expense row malfeasances and &#8220;private&#8221; scandals haven&#8221;t his &#8220;second&#8221; home fiddles been referred for possible prosecution?</p>
<p>Osborne, and another Chameleon favourite Caro Spelman, of Nannygate fame, must know where the crack is buried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quietzapple</title>
		<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/is-the-conservative-party-under-david-cameron-as-happy-a-ship-as-they-would-have-us-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>Quietzapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/?p=629#comment-916</guid>
		<description>The only conservative I know well agrees that Cameron is not at all popular.

Notable that a poll in the Times a month or so ago found that more people preferred a Labour Government to a Tory one:

http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2009/06/44-of-voters-want-cameron-to-lead-the-country-and-just-22-want-brown.html#comment-6a00d83451b31c69e201157171579c970b

&#039;&#039;The only serious caution for David Cameron comes with a question that forces voters to choose between Labour or the Conservatives: &quot;44 per cent would still prefer a Labour government and 42 per cent a Conservative one. This is despite 72 per cent dissatisfaction with Labour.&quot; &#039;&#039;

And, as Polly Toynbee noted, satisfaction with the NHS and various other &#039;&#039;services&#039;&#039; such as those relating to Law n Order have never been higher.

Mid term those polled will not give HMG, or their (usually) tory council, the credit.

Chameleon is too much the wide boy. The party which hated Heath, as many still do, for his cleverness and liberal views, will never take to the Heir to Blair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only conservative I know well agrees that Cameron is not at all popular.</p>
<p>Notable that a poll in the Times a month or so ago found that more people preferred a Labour Government to a Tory one:</p>
<p><a href="http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2009/06/44-of-voters-want-cameron-to-lead-the-country-and-just-22-want-brown.html#comment-6a00d83451b31c69e201157171579c970b" rel="nofollow">http://conservativehome.blogs.com/thetorydiary/2009/06/44-of-voters-want-cameron-to-lead-the-country-and-just-22-want-brown.html#comment-6a00d83451b31c69e201157171579c970b</a></p>
<p>&#8221;The only serious caution for David Cameron comes with a question that forces voters to choose between Labour or the Conservatives: &#8220;44 per cent would still prefer a Labour government and 42 per cent a Conservative one. This is despite 72 per cent dissatisfaction with Labour.&#8221; &#8221;</p>
<p>And, as Polly Toynbee noted, satisfaction with the NHS and various other &#8221;services&#8221; such as those relating to Law n Order have never been higher.</p>
<p>Mid term those polled will not give HMG, or their (usually) tory council, the credit.</p>
<p>Chameleon is too much the wide boy. The party which hated Heath, as many still do, for his cleverness and liberal views, will never take to the Heir to Blair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quietzapple</title>
		<link>http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/is-the-conservative-party-under-david-cameron-as-happy-a-ship-as-they-would-have-us-believe/comment-page-1/#comment-915</link>
		<dc:creator>Quietzapple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lordtobyharris.org.uk/?p=629#comment-915</guid>
		<description>They are the pitts, so much given to accusing Gordon Brown of dirty tricks while the McBride - Draper tentative plan was only uncovered by the dirty means of intercepted emails. 

Damian Green planted a snout in the Home Office to spy there, and received much other material from other departments, some of it illegally, though the Met &amp; CPS decided not to proceed.

The Guido Fawkes site is declared by its co-owner Paul Staines to be aimed at all politicians, but is devoted to libels and abuses to tear this government down, and is funded from his earnings from placing online advertising. Somehow I doubt his clients, who have brought him from bankruptcy to ownership of two houses, are labour supporters . . .

Osborne as attack dog has a rep which Wiki has to re-edit to reduce the sickening lump of his scandals, just as they do Johnson: B&#039;&#039;s.

One day the story of how the party the billionaires bought and the media the billionaires manipulated worked together to pervert the state which Britons built will be told in full, and the UK consensus will truly be broken, but not in the way they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are the pitts, so much given to accusing Gordon Brown of dirty tricks while the McBride &#8211; Draper tentative plan was only uncovered by the dirty means of intercepted emails. </p>
<p>Damian Green planted a snout in the Home Office to spy there, and received much other material from other departments, some of it illegally, though the Met &amp; CPS decided not to proceed.</p>
<p>The Guido Fawkes site is declared by its co-owner Paul Staines to be aimed at all politicians, but is devoted to libels and abuses to tear this government down, and is funded from his earnings from placing online advertising. Somehow I doubt his clients, who have brought him from bankruptcy to ownership of two houses, are labour supporters . . .</p>
<p>Osborne as attack dog has a rep which Wiki has to re-edit to reduce the sickening lump of his scandals, just as they do Johnson: B&#8221;s.</p>
<p>One day the story of how the party the billionaires bought and the media the billionaires manipulated worked together to pervert the state which Britons built will be told in full, and the UK consensus will truly be broken, but not in the way they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

