Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary, has made it clear that ID cards will not be compulsory. In a press conference, he said that the pilot schemes for airside workers to have ID cards in Manchester and London City Airports would not now be compulsory for UK citizens.
He said:
“Holding an identity card should be a personal choice for British citizens – just as it is now to obtain a passport. Accordingly I want the introduction of identity cards for all British citizens to be voluntary and I have therefore decided that identity cards issued to airside workers, planned initially at Manchester and London City airports later this year, should also be voluntary.”
At the press conference, he was asked by journalists if ID cards would be made obligatory and said quite clearly that they would not be.
In a Parliamentary written statement he said:
“There will be significant benefits to individuals from holding an identity card which will become the most convenient, secure and affordable way of asserting identity in everyday life. Identity cards will also be valid for travel throughout Europe in place of a British passport. ….. However, holding an identity card should be a personal choice for British citizens – just as it is now to obtain a passport. Accordingly I want the introduction of identity cards for all British citizens to be voluntary.”
This is a sensible and proportionate approach to adopt.
I have always felt that identity cards were mis-sold when they were first announced. They were never going to be a magic bullet in the battles against terrorism or organised crime – although that was what was claimed when the proposals were first aired. However, a simple system enabling the citizen to demonstrate – should they wish to do so – who they are always seemed to me to have enormous value (certainly better than having to turn up at a bank with a driving license, a council tax receipt and a utility bill). In essence, that is the system that the Government is now saying we will be moving towards.
10 Responses for "Home Secretary makes it clear that ID cards will NOT be compulsory"
[...] his blog, Lord Toby Harris thinks the climb down is sensible: I have always felt that identity cards were mis-sold when they were [...]
[...] Lord Toby Harris thinks [...]
This annoucement is little more than a different presentation of existing policy. It will still be compulsory to register onto to National Identity Register when one renews one’s passport. Whether one chooses to get an additional piece of plastic to go along with that registration, is of little import. If Alan Johnson is serious about making ID Cards voluntary then registration on the National Identity Register must also be voluntary. If I am compelled to go on the register when I renew my passport or my photo-driving licence then it is not voluntary.
As no-one has said that the information required for a new passport will be stepped up to include NI No, fingerprints etc inclusion on the National Identity Register will be pretty skeletal.
In my view the numbers of complaints re passports – delays, thefts, fraud involving forged or stolen passports – makes a listing of passports inevitable.
As passports last at least 10 years now I recall, and provision of extra information is not required this is a significant change in policy. It leaves open the likelihood that having a ID card will be enough of an advantage that more and more people will volunteer to have one.
Has anyone said that the information to be captured in the National Identity Register will be reduced from the currently specified 57 items of information? Once on the register, an individual will be subject to some pretty severe criminal sanctions should he not keep the record up-to-date. Passport holders have never before been fined for failing to update the Passport Office with a change of address. These criminal sanctions belong to the policy of compulsory identity cards. It is disingenuous for Mr Johnson to claim that ID Cards are voluntary when he keeps the essential elements of the ID Cards Act 2006 unchanged. This is sleight of hand and it really doesn’t fool anyone who is familiar with the legislation.
We can expect a question to be put to him if it is commonly suspected that those applying for a passport will have to supply all the info which could be put onto the database.
Don’t worry. We shall continue to remind Mr Johnson that he has not repealed the legislation that makes registration upon the National Identity Register compulsory. If he is genuine about making ID Cards voluntary then registration upon the register should likewise be voluntary. If he is honest and genuine about his intention to make participation in the National Identity Scheme voluntary then he should have little difficulty in making that commitment.
We await the pressed men and women, and there will be none, but talk of them will increase, tendentiously.
“We await the pressed men and women, and there will be none, but talk of them will increase, tendentiousl”
That’’s an impressively elliptical remark. Let’’s make things simple. Is registration on the NIR voluntary or not. It is a direct and simple question and surely Mr Johnson can answer it.
If the answer were in the negative the question would have been put and publicised surely?
There are myriad tory MPs and others banging a dubious tambourine with liberty misspelt on its side.
The new Home Secretary will no doubt decide the relationship between the register and passports in good time. A number of possibilities must be decoded between I would have thoguht.
The Identity and Passport Office also says:
“However, you may be aware that the Home Secretary recently made an announcement about the National Identity Service and this is available at: http://www.ips.gov.uk/cps/rde/xchg/ips_live/hs.xsl/100.htm.
“You can also find out more on our online information service, through the DirectGov website, which is available at: http://www.direct.gov.uk/identity.”
Leave a reply