Admiral Lord Alan West, the Security Minister, has spoken out today about the cyber-threat that Britain faces. I am pleased that he has tackled the subject so directly. Too many businesses and too much of Government have been complacent about what has been happening for years.
When I first started raising the problem in the House of Lords more than five years ago, I was repeatedly assured that there was no significant threat and that the protection around the critical national infrastructure was more than sufficient to fend off any problems.
When I started asking questions of each Government Department about how often their systems had been compromised, it was apparent from the answers that some Departments simply didn’t know. I was clearly making progress when two years ago, I started being told it was “not in the national interest” to divulge the information.
When I found three reputable penetration-testing companies prepared to check Government systems pro bono, I was assured such external testing was not needed.
Now – at last – the real and present danger of such cyber-attacks is being acknowledged and the necessary systems to combat it are starting to be put in place. I just hope it is not too little too late.
Liam Fox’s office has been in touch with journalists complaining about Gordon Brown’s visit to British troops. In an interesting insight into the Tory mindset the troops are described as “political props”.
It is the most cynical of political games to suggest that it is wrong for the Prime Minister to visit now. Even Liam Fox must know that there will be a General Election in the next few months – for all anyone knows it could be called this month. Once the Election is announced it will, of course, be difficult for politicians to visit without their motives being misinterpreted. But what the Tories seem to be arguing is that any visit at any time by the Prime Minister uses the troops as “political props”.
But just imagine the Tories’ complaints if the Prime Minister didn’t visit.
The Prime Minister is right to have gone to Afghanistan to visit British troops – something he has done regularly since he took office.
And it is Liam Fox and Cameron’s Conservatives who are playing politics.
Cynical is hardly an adequate description of their games.
I have had a rather scary thought.
This evening there was a meeting of the Labour Peers’ Group. Now normally I follow a strict rule that I never post on this blog about private meetings I have attended, nor reveal any privileged information I acquire on such occasions. However, to explain my scary thought I have to reveal just a little about this meeting. (I promise I won’t deviate again.)
This evening’s meeting received an oral briefing from Black Rod, who is amongst other things responsible for security in the House of Lords and about which he was briefing colleagues.
I have just remembered the last time Black Rod (or rather his predecessor) attended a meeting of the Labour Peers. It was for a similar purpose. And I remember on the previous occasion a number of (very) senior colleagues making scathing remarks about the need for any greater security in the Palace of Westminster (there was no repetition this evening I am pleased to say).
And the date of this previous visit?
Wednesday 6th July 2005.
Remember what happened the following morning ……
Fanatical followers of this blog (and you both know who you are) will be aware that – as is my habit – I posted a short tongue-in-cheek piece from the Metropolitan Police Authority meeting at 11.06 on Thursday 25th February.
This poked gentle fun at the man I call the DCiC (Dog-Catcher-in-Chief), Kit Malthouse, and his sensitivity about the nit-picking from the Green’s Jenny Jones at his attendance record. I referred to his boast that he had attended 46 meetings since the last session of the MPA and this Stakhanovite work-rate was even more impressive given that he had been on holiday for a week of that time. I also mentioned his nickname: “HoT” – a reference to his Hand on Tiller fixation.
Sometimes I think my sense of humour is rather esoteric and unlikely to be shared by anyone else, so it was gratifying to learn that some three hours later at 2.02 Ross Lydall posted his own thoughts on the same subject on the Evening Standard web-site. He even has his own nickname for Kit – he calls him “The Tillerman” and he linked to the same article as I did to illustrate the nitpicking.
My cup runneth over – I am not alone.
We clearly are thinking the same.
Ross Lydall, under the headline
said:
“Kit Malthouse began his first meeting as chairman of the Metropolitan Police Authority by revealing he had attended or chaired 46 meetings since the MPA last met (on January 28). What’s more, he had squeezed in a week’s holiday to boot.
Why this inconsequential start to proceedings? Because the Greens made quite a fusson the eve of his confirmation hearing as MPA chair (he succeeds the fleeing Boris, who has obviously realised what hard work it is) by revealing that Kit had failed to ever attend all three key MPA sub-committees of which he is a member in the 18 months since the Tory takeover of City Hall.”
And I said (just three hours earlier):
“The Metropolitan Police Authority is in session and the DCiC*, Deputy Mayor Kit “HoT”** Malthouse AM is in the Chair.
And the DCiC was showing his sensitive side. He has clearly been hurt by the criticism that he is too busy to fulfil the role of MPA Chair and the nit-picking about his attendance record at MPA Committee meetings. So the item on the agenda for his oral report consisted merely of him telling the Authority that he had had 46 meetings in the last month – and as he was away or one of the weeks concerned that works out as a productivity rate of around 3 per working day.
He promises to keep us informed of his work rate at future meetings, but that will not satisfy Jenny Jones AM. She wants an indicator measuring the “quality” of the meetings. No doubt those meeting HoT in future will be asked to fill in a form afterwards asking “how was it for them?”
However, HoT is clearly alive to this danger: he assured the Authority that he prefers what he calls “action” to meetings.”
Now isn’t that nice ….